Entre laudos e liberdade: o método de Rorschach e a reinserção no contexto jurídico-penal

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze the application of the Rorschach Method as an auxiliary instrument in criminal-legal contexts. The research, of a qualitative and exploratory nature, was based on a bibliographic review of academic productions, legal and normative documents, with the objective of critically examining the technical, methodological and ethical foundations involved in the use of the Rorschach in the forensic expert context. The fragility of the legal concept of dangerousness was discussed, as well as the subjective implications and limitations of the examination of cessation of dangerousness and the lack of technical-scientific standardization in the forensic context. The study highlighted the potential of the Rorschach Method as a projective tool for accessing psychic functioning, as long as it is applied in accordance with the technical criteria and in a multi-method approach, respecting the regulations of the Federal Council of Psychology. Furthermore, the research explored alternative programs to the asylum logic, such as PAI-PJ, PAILI-GO and EAP, which are structured under the principles of Psychiatric Reform, prioritizing care in freedom and intersectoral articulation between justice and health. It was concluded that the use of Rorschach in the judicial system requires technical rigor, empirical basis and ethical commitment, contributing to more precise, contextualized assessments aligned with the promotion of dignity and social reintegration of the subject in conflict with the law